PHM-Exch> How can we feed the world and still save the planet?

Claudio Schuftan cschuftan at phmovement.org
Fri Jan 21 18:20:01 PST 2011


From: Flavio Valente <Valente at fian.org>

*From:* Olivier De Schutter [mailto:olivier.deschutter at uclouvain.be]




*How can we feed the world and still save the planet?*

*
*
http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/jan/21/olivier-de-schutter-food-farming

 Underinvestment and market failures have trapped many countries in a
vicious cycle of low productivity and exposure to price hikes, says Olivier
de Schutter, the UN special rapporteur on the right to food


Food <http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/food><http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/food>
has become subject to one of the sharpest global debates, with rising
anxiety about how the world's growing population is going to feed itself.
Increasingly, Olivier de Schutter
<http://www.srfood.org/><http://www.srfood.org/>, the UN special
rapporteur on the right to food, is establishing himself as
one of its key protagonists with an unapologetically radical agenda.

In London this week to give evidence to a UK parliamentary working group on
food and agriculture, he explained the challenge he is putting to the donors
and the international community.

Chronic underinvestment in agriculture over the last 20 years combined with
trade liberalisation has trapped many developing countries in a vicious
cycle of low agricultural productivity and dependence on cheap food imports,
he argues. The one exacerbates the other as local farmers struggle, and
fail, to get a decent price for their produce in competition with imports,
which have often benefited from government subsidies.

Local farming <http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/farming><http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/farming>
goes into steep decline leading to migration to the cities. This is a
serious market failure.

Faced with large hungry (and often jobless) urban populations, government
policy is driven by the need to keep food cheap at all costs or risk
political instability, such as the rioting seen recently in countries such
as Algeria
<http://www.voanews.com/english/news/Two-Killed-Hundreds-Injured-in-Algerian-Food-Riots-113133109.html><http://www.voanews.com/english/news/Two-Killed-Hundreds-Injured-in-Algerian-Food-Riots-113133109.html>.

"In the short term, lower import tariffs to let in food ensure urban
populations are fed, but in the long term it is a disaster because local
farmers can't compete," says de Schutter, adding that cheap food imports
make the country extremely vulnerable to price hikes in the global markets –
such as those we are now seeing.

"Since the early 1990s, the food bills of developing countries have
increased by five- or six-fold," says de Schutter. "This addiction to cheap
food leads to balance-of-payments problems and then political instability.
It deprives countries of their abilities to feed themselves."

This situation has skewed the politics of countless countries where the
priority has been to maintain calm in urban areas while squeezing any value
they can from farmers. Farmers are marginalised politically and become
increasingly poor, further accelerating the migration to cities.

Donors are finally recognising the need to invest in agriculture, but the
danger is that they put money into monoculture cash crops for export, a
strategy that that has no impact on improving food security
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/food-security><http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/food-security>
for the poorest, argues de Schutter.

Another major mistake being made by donors, he adds, is to offer inputs to
farmers such as subsidised fertiliser. This works in the short term but is
not sustainable in the longer term because the price of fertilisers are
linked to the rising price of oil, and the urgent task is to decouple
agriculture from oil.

The environmental challenge is huge. "A third of all greenhouse emissions
come from agriculture, so we need to focus our efforts on an agriculture
which does not degrade the soil and which increases carbon capture," he
explains, adding that he will be presenting a paper on agroecology
<http://www.agroecology.org/> <http://www.agroecology.org/>   to the UN
Human Rights Council
<http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/><http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/>
in March.

He wants donors to move away from the model of subsisidised fertilisers and
seeds – which he calls "private goods", to supporting "public goods" such as
better infrastructure, strengthening local markets, ensuring access to
credit and building storage capabilities. Much of this needs farmers to
organise themselves to really bring benefits to rural areas.

"Farmers' co-operatives emerged from the bottom-up in the 90s, and they now
need to move up the value chain into processing and packaging. Farmers can
get a better price if they organise together. And if they are organised,
then governments have to engage with them. Farmers need a greater voice in
the political process otherwise they don't get consulted and are cheated,"
he says.

But he acknowledges that this is not always a popular message. In many
countries governments are wary of a strong, well-organised farmers'
co-operative movement that could threaten their strategy to feed urban
populations.

The challenge is huge because in the last 25 years state agricultural
extension services have been dismantled, largely at the behest of structural
adjustment programmes, and farmers have been left to fend for themselves. To
increase productivity and introduce agroecology techniques in places such as
sub Saharan Africa requires institutions that can disseminate knowledge into
remote rural areas. This is no easy task.

Finally, de Schutter has one other urgent recommendation. The G20 in May
will be considering measures to manage food-price volatility and he believes
that food reserves are an essential tool.

"My view is that food reserves could be used to support the income of
farmers, buying at a good price and then make food affordable during times
of rising prices. If a food reserve is well managed and transparent, it
could limit volatility and secure incomes," he says.

He points out that China now has huge food reserves in wheat, maize and rice
that can shield the population from price spikes. There are ongoing
negotiations to arrange regional collaboration across south-east Asia and to
mutualise national food reserves. Similar discussions took place last
December in West Africa. The G20 must put greater impetus behind such
regional co-operation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phm.phmovement.org/pipermail/phm-exchange-phmovement.org/attachments/20110121/13c690c1/attachment.html>


More information about the PHM-Exchange mailing list