<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>For me, this PHM comment is a tour de force. Big thanks to the
      author, presumably David.<br>
    </p>
    <p>I quote one para in particular because I feel that this point
      MUST be transmitted (by us) to journalists, above all. Also, if we
      can, we must all try and spread this message through articles in
      our local or national media. <br>
    </p>
    <p dir="ltr"><span><b>"The</b><b> SDGs provide an inspiring vision
          of ‘the world we want’. However, they also serve to distract
          attention from the economic and political forces which are
          preventing the realisation of this vision. In effect they are
          helping to maintain an appearance of good faith and commitment
          on the part of those who are in effect working to prevent the
          achievement of the goals. This is the legitimation function of
          the SDGs." <br>
        </b></span></p>
    <p dir="ltr"><span>We need to identify explicitly who "those" are
        (those who are working to prevent the achievement of those
        goals). Briefly, the rich and powerful countries and their TNCs.
        How do they do this? Through multistakeholder partnerships,
        mostly. <br>
      </span></p>
    <p dir="ltr"><span>I think that these mechanisms are not understood
        at all, even on the left. (For example, Le Monde Diplomatique
        partners with the Global Fund and publishes articles from them,
        seemingly uncritically.) <b> <br>
        </b></span></p>
    <p dir="ltr"><span>WHO today will claim, as it usually does, that
        the role of the current economic order is beyond its mandate.
        This to me is the other key point to debate publicly now. As
        part of its advocacy role, and as a knowledge organization, the
        question is well within WHO's mandate. And I am sure we can find
        articles/sentences in the constitution and in the Alma Ata
        Declaration (which has not been repudiated) and of course in
        General Comment 14 on the Right to Health, that illustrate that
        point. <br>
      </span></p>
    <p dir="ltr"><span>Anyway, big thanks again and I hope these
        critical points get wide airing. alison</span></p>
    <p dir="ltr"><span>PS when is GHW5 coming out?<br>
      </span></p>
    <p dir="ltr"><span><br>
      </span></p>
    <p dir="ltr"><span> <br>
      </span></p>
    <p dir="ltr"><span><br>
      </span></p>
    <p dir="ltr"><span><br>
      </span></p>
    <p dir="ltr"><span><br>
      </span></p>
    <p dir="ltr"><span><br>
      </span></p>
    <p dir="ltr"><span><br>
      </span></p>
    <span></span>
    <p> </p>
    Le 08.04.19 à 10:22, Claudio Schuftan a écrit :<br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKpaG8gnqFw=jU=Qh4zjmDy7vdGDTPkFpuoDDaWtcjXv=M-ZxQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div class="gmail_default">
            <h1 dir="ltr"
              id="gmail-docs-internal-guid-b869ee4e-7fff-77b6-8375-a2d7f434c441"><span>PHM
                Comment</span></h1>
            <h2 dir="ltr"><span>SDG shortfalls point to core
                contradiction</span></h2>
            <h1 dir="ltr"><span>Notes for discussion at WHA72, WHO, end
                May 2019</span></h1>
            <div>(The links refer to documents in the WHO website)</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div><span>Your feedback welcome; to be sent to David Legge
                <<a href="mailto:dlegge@phmovement.org"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">dlegge@phmovement.org</a>><br>
              </span></div>
            <p dir="ltr"><span><span></span></span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>Part I of </span><a
                href="http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA72/A72_11-en.pdf"
                moz-do-not-send="true"><span>A72/11</span></a><span> is
                a burning indictment of the health consequences of the
                prevailing global governance regime. Likewise the more
                detailed figures provided in </span><a
href="https://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2018/en/"
                moz-do-not-send="true"><span>WHS18</span></a><span> and
                the actual 2030 targets here.   </span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>Part I of </span><a
                href="http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA72/A72_11-en.pdf"
                moz-do-not-send="true"><span>A72/11</span></a><span>needs
                to be read far more widely than just within WHO.  Health
                science students and practitioners should read this and
                ask why. Journalists should read and ask why.
                Parliamentarians should read and ask why.</span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>Unfortunately </span><a
                href="http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA72/A72_11-en.pdf"
                moz-do-not-send="true"><span>A72/11</span></a><span>
                does not seek to explain the looming shortfalls in the
                SDG targets. </span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>Various reports including the </span><a
                href="http://sdgindex.org/" moz-do-not-send="true"><span>SDG
                  Index and Dashboard</span></a><span> report show that
                no country is on track to achieve the SDGs by 2030. In
                fact the number of people living in poverty in Africa is
                increasing; likewise the number of children who are
                stunted. Global maternal mortality (now 216 per 100,000
                live births) is unlikely to reach the target of 70 by
                2030 if the rate in Africa remains high (currently 542).
              </span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>Part II lists a range of WHO programs,
                projects and engagements and seeks to demonstrate how,
                through these activities, WHO is contributing to the
                achievement of the SDGs. Many of these are admirable
                initiatives and WHO staff are to be congratulated for
                their commitment and achievement. </span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>Unfortunately, despite these valiant
                efforts, in many areas the shortfalls with respect to
                achieving the health related targets are growing. </span><a
href="http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA72/A72_11-en.pdf"
                moz-do-not-send="true"><span>A72/11</span></a><span>
                does not seek to explain these widening shortfalls. 
                Simply listing all of the activities which WHO is
                contributing to is not enough. </span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>The key to understanding the widening
                shortfalls in achievement is the contradiction between
                the humanistic aspirations of the SDGs and the dynamics
                of liberalised transnational capitalism. </span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>Simply measuring poverty distracts
                attention from the distribution of global wealth and
                global income and the dynamics which maintain extreme
                inequalities of wealth and income;</span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>Simply measuring stunting distracts
                attention from the world food system including
                protection and price supports in the rich world; the
                capture of arable land, water, and energy to over-feed
                the rich; the global structures which drive small
                farmers off their land.</span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>Simply measuring health care
                impoverishment distracts attention from the global
                forces, political and economic, which extract the wealth
                of resource rich countries leaving governments without
                the fiscal capacity to underwrite health care costs;
                which enforce high prices of medicines in order to
                maintain pharma profits and export earnings.   </span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>Simply noting the impact of global
                warming on food production and environmental disaster
                distracts attention from the corporate and political
                forces seeking to prevent and defer action on greenhouse
                gas emissions. </span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>The SDGs provide an inspiring vision of
                ‘the world we want’. However, they also serve to
                distract attention from the economic and political
                forces which are preventing the realisation of this
                vision. In effect they are helping to maintain an
                appearance of good faith and commitment on the part of
                those who are in effect working to prevent the
                achievement of the goals. This is the legitimation
                function of the SDGs. </span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>PHM urges member state delegates to speak
                truth to power at the Health Assembly.</span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>PHM urges health activists around the
                world to raise public awareness and lobby their
                governments around the disaster that is looming behind
                the language of ‘sustainable development’.  Key talking
                points in such advocacy include: </span></p>
            <ul>
              <li dir="ltr">
                <p dir="ltr"><span>insist on naming liberalised
                    transnational capitalism as a failed economic system
                    (driving widening inequality, deepening the
                    imbalances between productive capacity and
                    consumption, increasing financial fragility and
                    deepening our peonage to the banks through
                    increasing debt);</span></p>
              </li>
              <li dir="ltr">
                <p dir="ltr"><span>insist on naming neoliberalism as a
                    policy package (austerity, small government,
                    privatisation, tax competition and corporate
                    privilege) being implemented in order to protect the
                    transnational corporations and preserve the
                    privileges of the transnational capitalist elite;  </span></p>
              </li>
              <li dir="ltr">
                <p dir="ltr"><span>recognise the contradictions between
                    the neoliberal program on the one hand and the goals
                    of reducing poverty, promoting Health for All, and
                    mitigating climate change on the other;</span></p>
              </li>
              <li dir="ltr">
                <p dir="ltr"><span>reject the bizarre assumption that
                    the SDGs can be paid for through increased economic
                    growth (as measured by GDP) without attention to the
                    harms or benefits of the market transactions so
                    measured;</span></p>
              </li>
              <li dir="ltr">
                <p dir="ltr"><span>insist on the need for a New
                    International Economic Order as called for in the
                    1978 </span><a
                    href="https://www.who.int/publications/almaata_declaration_en.pdf"
                    moz-do-not-send="true"><span>Alma-Ata Declaration</span></a><span>
                    (and completely ignored in the October 2018 </span><a
href="https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/primary-health/declaration/gcphc-declaration.pdf"
                    moz-do-not-send="true"><span>Astana Declaration</span></a><span>);</span></p>
              </li>
              <li dir="ltr">
                <p dir="ltr"><span>insist on naming the xenophobic
                    backlash, and the populist demagoguery which is
                    stoking it, as barriers to effective action on the
                    SDGs; and</span></p>
              </li>
              <li dir="ltr">
                <p dir="ltr"><span>continue to denounce the restrictions
                    imposed on WHO’s capacity and its voice by the donor
                    chokehold and the ACs freeze.</span></p>
              </li>
            </ul>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>These issues are all strikingly absent
                from </span><a
                href="http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA72/A72_11-en.pdf"
                moz-do-not-send="true"><span>A72/11</span></a><span>. </span></p>
            <h2 dir="ltr"><span>Internal contradictions</span></h2>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>In previous commentaries we have focused
                on the contradictions within and across the SDGs
                themselves.  These remain important. </span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>See </span><a
href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hy64u7j2T6f0flFdxglfh_-UKwLJd7vu7_0vktnWftk/edit?usp=sharing"
                moz-do-not-send="true"><span>PHM comment on Item 31.2 at
                  WHA69</span></a><span> which highlighted:</span></p>
            <ul>
              <li dir="ltr">
                <p dir="ltr"><span>Goal 12 which promises sustainable
                    consumption and production but lacks any drivers to
                    achieve this;</span></p>
              </li>
              <li dir="ltr">
                <p dir="ltr"><span>Goal 8 which promises high rates of
                    economic growth but ignores the contradictions
                    between economic growth and ecological
                    sustainability; and</span></p>
              </li>
              <li dir="ltr">
                <p dir="ltr"><span>the contradictions between the SDGs
                    and the real effects of ‘free trade’;</span></p>
              </li>
            </ul>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>See also </span><a
href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1710S9ZzSn5W_g1Y6H5sdQ-PHjcaByPqn4Ant8K9rCeA/edit?usp=sharing"
                moz-do-not-send="true"><span>PHM comment on Item 16.1 at
                  WHA70</span></a><span> which highlighted:</span></p>
            <ul>
              <li dir="ltr">
                <p dir="ltr"><span>the need for a real world ‘theory of
                    change’ regarding how the SDGs could be achieved;</span></p>
              </li>
              <li dir="ltr">
                <p dir="ltr"><span>the dangers of the drive towards
                    ‘multi-stakeholder partnerships’, as in SDG17.16 and
                    17.17, which projects universal beneficence and
                    completely ignores the Trojan horse functions of
                    many such ‘partnerships’;</span></p>
              </li>
              <li dir="ltr">
                <p dir="ltr"><span>the importance of following the
                    health implications of </span><span>all</span><span>
                    of the SDGs.</span></p>
              </li>
            </ul>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>Two of the chapters in the current Global
                Health Watch</span><span> also carry powerful criticisms
                of the SDGs:</span></p>
            <ul>
              <li dir="ltr">
                <p dir="ltr"><span>A1: </span><a
                    href="https://phmovement.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/A1.pdf"
                    moz-do-not-send="true"><span>Sustainable Development
                      Goals in the age of Neoliberalism</span></a></p>
              </li>
              <li dir="ltr">
                <p dir="ltr"><span>A2: </span><a
                    href="https://phmovement.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/A2.pdf"
                    moz-do-not-send="true"><span>‘Leave No One Behind’ —
                      are SDGs the way forward?</span></a></p>
              </li>
            </ul>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>SDG8 proposes that the cost of meeting
                the rest of the goals will be met through ‘sustained per
                capita economic growth’.  GHW comments that the assumed
                metric, GDP, is a measure of market transactions
                regardless of their contribution to ecological
                sustainability or human development (or health).
                Manufacturing and deploying weapons of mass destruction
                makes a powerful contribution to GDP.  </span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>SDG8 calls for full employment (Target
                8.5) and for ‘higher levels of economic productivity’
                (‘increase in real GDP per employed person’). This
                combination of targets ignores the role of productivity
                increases (as measured) in creating unemployment! 
                Conventional economic theory assumes that the labour
                displaced by increased productivity will simply be
                re-employed in new forms of better-paying work. What
                such theory disregards is the massive displacement of
                agricultural labour from ‘increased productivity’ in
                agriculture and the huge mobilisation of Third World
                workers (displaced from agriculture) in global
                manufacturing: “too many workers competing for too few
                jobs to produce too many goods or services for too few
                consumers with too little income to afford them without
                increasing their already high levels of personal debt”.
                 </span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>GHW5 also comments on the continuing call
                for increased ‘development assistance’ as a key pathway
                to funding the SDGs. This strategy has failed to impact
                on sustainable development over several decades even
                while fragmenting health systems and placing huge
                administrative burdens of governments.  Meanwhile no
                action is proposed on tax evasion through transfer
                pricing and tax havens nor on the pressures of tax
                competition and corporate tax extortion which have held
                back tax revenues and public spending. </span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>GHW5 also comments on principle of
                reciprocity (non-discrimination) in the current regime
                of trade agreements; a principle which treats poor
                countries the same as rich countries despite massive
                differences in economic and political power. The New
                International Economic Order, which features in the
                Alma-Ata Declaration (and is notably missing from the
                2018 Astana Declaration), envisaged discrimination in
                favour of developing countries to be structured into a
                rules based trading regime. Not only are modern trade
                agreements non-discriminatory (in the sense of including
                few or no provisions for ‘special and differential
                treatment’) but they discriminate blatantly in favour of
                the rich countries through extreme IP provisions,
                regulatory harmonisation and investor protection.  </span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span>GHW5 also addresses the difficult topic
                of population control. It is established that family
                sizes fall with economic development and the provision
                of social protection. However as population levels level
                or fall in the rich countries the call is increasingly
                heard for encouragement for population growth through
                fertility and (selective) immigration. GHW5 labels this
                as a Ponzi population policy:</span></p>
            <p dir="ltr"><span> Its argument is that, with population
                aging, immigration and/or incentives for larger families
                should be encouraged to re-swell a comparatively
                shrinking working age cohort (those between 15 and 64
                years).The economic rationale is that the taxes
                collected from the productivity of the working age
                population is needed to pay for the services and
                pensions of a proportionately greater and increasing
                number of elderly.That makes sense, perhaps, for the
                short-term. But fast forward 40 or 50 years, and the
                re-swelled working age cohort has itself become elderly
                (and far more numerous), requiring an ever larger
                expansion in the base of the working age population.And
                so on, and on, and on. </span><span> </span></p>
            <h1 dir="ltr"><span><br>
              </span></h1>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
PHM-Exchange People's Health Movement
- To post, write to: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:PHM-Exchange@phm.phmovement.org">PHM-Exchange@phm.phmovement.org</a>
- To view the archive, receive one weekly posting with all the week's postings, edit your subscription's options or unsubscribe, please go to the PHM-Exchange webpage: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://phm.phmovement.org/listinfo.cgi/phm-exchange-phmovement.org">http://phm.phmovement.org/listinfo.cgi/phm-exchange-phmovement.org</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>