<h2><font><span style="font-weight:normal">From Baby Milk Action</span></font><br></h2><h2></h2><h2>Nestlé spied on campaigners - court orders companies to pay damages to victims</h2><p>Nestlé has been ordered
by a Swiss court to pay damages and costs to members of Attac
Switzerland, after it infiltrated the group with spies who reported to a
former MI6 officer working for Nestlé. Securitas, which ran the spies
for Nestlé, has also been ordered to pay damages to the campaigners.</p><p>One of the spies joined the editorial board for the book <em>Attac against the Nestlé Empire</em> - Baby Milk Action spoke at the launch of the book in 2004 in Nestlé's home town of Vevey, Switzerland.</p>
<p>In typical media management style, Nestlé
responded publicly to the court order by saying it would study the
Judge’s ruling and, <em>"If it should turn out that a Nestlé employee had acted negligently, we shall take appropriate measures."</em></p>
<p>Fortunately <em>Le Courier</em> newspaper
was not so naive as to fall for Nestlé's spin that the spying operation
may have been an the over-enthusiastic rogue employee breaking the
rules, commenting (26 January 2013):</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>"One may recall that the [Nestlé]
defense attorneys had worked diligently to present the ATTAC members as
potential criminals in order to better justify 'the preventive
observation' of their activities. They had also declared that owing to
their militant commitment, they could not 'claim such an extended
protection of the private sphere' as an ordinary citizen."</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>In other words, Nestlé’s defense in court was campaigners are fair game to be spied on. The Judge disagreed.</p>
<p>For a press release from Attac Switzerland on the spying operation that ran from 2003 to at least 2008, see:<br>
<a href="http://info.babymilkaction.org/pressrelease/pressrelease26jan13attac" target="_blank">http://info.babymilkaction.org/pressrelease/<br>
pressrelease26jan13attac</a> </p>
<p>Although spying and then trying to excuse it in court is shocking, it is in keeping with Nestlé's past and current behaviour.</p>
<p>For example, Nestlé is currently attempting
to economically blackmail the Philippines Government into weakening its
baby milk marketing regulations, just as it threatened Zimbabwe in the
1990s. </p>
<p>Last year Nestlé opened a special hi-tech
centre at its headquarters to monitor and respond to comments on the
internet. In 2010 an online marketing company claimed in its promotional
materials that Nestlé was paying its celebrity contacts US$10,000 a
tweet for promoting Nestlé on Twitter.</p>
<p>For Baby Milk Action's reaction, links to
news reports and a reminder of other past and present scandals involving
Nestlé's use of the dark arts, see:<br>
<a href="http://info.babymilkaction.org/pressrelease/pressrelease26jan13" target="_blank">http://info.babymilkaction.org/pressrelease/<br>
pressrelease26jan13</a></p><p><a href="http://info.babymilkaction.org/pressrelease/pressrelease26jan13" target="_blank"><br></a></p>