PHM-Exch> UN adopts Universal Health Coverage
Claudio Schuftan
cschuftan at phmovement.org
Thu Dec 20 07:04:17 PST 2012
From: gaurab roy <gaurab18 at gmail.com>
From: Debashis Dutt <drdebashisdutt at yahoo.com>
UN adopts 'momentous' resolution on universal healthcare
General assembly urges countries to launch affordable healthcare systems
that cover all their citizens.
-
<http://www.facebook.com/dialog/feed?app_id=180444840287&link=http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/2012/dec/13/un-momentous-resolution-universal-healthcare&display=popup&redirect_uri=http://static-serve.appspot.com/static/facebook-share/callback.html&show_error=false>
-
*
*
The UN's adoption of a resolution on affordable universal
healthcare<http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/67/L.36>(pdf)
was momentous, according to its advocates.
The resolution, adopted by consensus in the general assembly on Wednesday,
urged member states to develop health systems that avoid significant direct
payments at the point of delivery and to have a mechanism for pooling risks
to avoid catastrophic healthcare spending and impoverishment.
There was unusually wide support for the
resolution<http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/2012/dec/12/un-vote-universal-health-coverage>.
It came from the global north and south, including the US, the UK, South
Africa and Thailand. By gaining support from every corner of the globe, the
resolution recognised enthusiasm for universal healthcare from diverse
countries and economies<http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/speeches-presentations/jeanette-vega-managing-director>,
said the Rockefeller Foundation, which has funded research on universal
health systems.
According to the foundation, 150 million people worldwide face high
healthcare costs, which push around 25m households into poverty each year.
More than 3 billion people have to pay for healthcare themselves, forcing
many – particularly women and children – to choose between healthcare and
education.
Ceri Averill, Oxfam's health policy adviser, said significant momentum
around the vote had been building for the past two years, partly through
the efforts of the World Health Organisation's director, Margaret
Chan<http://www.who.int/whr/2010/en/index.html>,
and showed real public commitment to universal healthcare. "We can hold
member states to account because of the resolution," she said.
For Averill and Jeanette Vega, managing director of Rockefeller,
endorsement of the resolution means universal healthcare will now be on the
agenda of the UN high-level
panel<http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/2012/nov/21/human-rights-faultline-development-agenda>
–
co-chaired by the UK prime minister, David Cameron, President Ellen Johnson
Sirleaf of Liberia and President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono of Indonesia –
discussing the post-2015 development goals.
"There have been lots of discussions of what health goals should be, for
example on non-communicable diseases. This resolution gives weight to
health systems as a whole and questions of equity. It ensures that
universal healthcare stays on the agenda as one of the
post-MDG<http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/millennium-development-goals>goals,"
said Averill.
Supporting universal healthcare is one thing, funding it is another. As
the UN delegate from Singapore, Lee Boon Beng, said: "The path to achieving
universal health coverage is complex and there is no universal formula.
Instead, member states should adopt different solutions to their unique
circumstances."
Here the debate revolves on the use of highly contentious user
fees<http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/sarah-boseley-global-health/2012/oct/01/worldbank-healthinsurance>,
insurance or general taxation. For Averill the problem with user fees and
insurance is that the poorest people will not be able to afford them.
Citing Ghana, she said no matter how low the insurance premiums are set,
these will be out of reach of the poorest people and contribute very little
in terms of funding. Many Ghanaians work in the informal sector, for
example as street vendors, which makes it difficult to collect premiums.
Thailand is held up as a pioneer in developing universal health
coverage<http://www.nationmultimedia.com/opinion/Healthcare-in-Thailand-a-story-to-inspire-confiden-30180854.html>.
The south-east Asian country introduced free universal healthcare at the
point of delivery in 2002 and has shown the concept is not out of reach of
middle-income countries. Around 99% of the Thai population is covered
through a comprehensive healthcare package. It ranges from health
prevention and primary care, to hospitalisation due to traffic
accidents<http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/2012/may/15/thailand-head-start-road-safety>,
to more expensive services such as radiotherapy and access to
antiretroviral therapy treatment for people with HIV. Indonesia, the
Philippines and China have rolled out insurance-based health
coverage<http://www.economist.com/node/21562210> that
includes almost their entire populations.
Poorer countries, however, will have to rely on external help to extend
affordable healthcare. Zambia on Thursday said it has been steadily
increasing spending on healthcare, which is treated as a fundamental human
right, but will have to rely on foreign help. "External financing equally
remains an important factor in Zambia's resource mobilisation," said the
country's delegate, Dr Mwaba Kasese-Bota.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phm.phmovement.org/pipermail/phm-exchange-phmovement.org/attachments/20121220/80fe067a/attachment.html>
More information about the PHM-Exchange
mailing list