PHA-Exchange> The Patients' Charter Tuberculosis (5)
claudio at hcmc.netnam.vn
claudio at hcmc.netnam.vn
Tue Nov 1 11:58:16 PST 2005
-- from George Kent <kent at hawaii.edu> -----
In my view, the key point is to recognize that we all have the same
basic right to health, as articulated in General Comment 14. We
should not suggest that any subgroup has any special rights with
regard to health. It makes sense to discuss the ways in which GC14
would apply to particular people in particular circumstances, but one
should not suggest that any one group should have special rights.
To draw an analogy, the conventions on the human rights of special
groups such as women, children, refugees, and migrant workers are
best understood as articulating how general human rights law and
principles apply to them. These conventions do not give them special
rights.
A similar analysis can be made for regional human rights agreements,
in Africa, Latin America, and Europe. They are about the
implementation of universal human rights, not about the creation of
special rights for people living in these regions.
One consequence of this view is that one should not argue that people
with a particular disease should get free health care treatment.
Instead, the approach should be to formulate the principles, based on
interpretation of general human rights law and principles, under
which people with any disease ought to get free treatment.
------------------------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through Netnam-HCMC ISP: http://www.hcmc.netnam.vn/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phm.phmovement.org/pipermail/phm-exchange-phmovement.org/attachments/20051102/d88280a6/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the PHM-Exchange
mailing list