PHA-Exchange> The Public Library of Science: Open Access to Scientific Research
George(s) Lessard
media at web.net
Wed Aug 20 05:31:48 PDT 2003
------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 22:17:48 -0500
From: Paul Nielson <p.nielson at shaw.ca>
To: govinfo <govinfo at yorku.ca>, eco-man at io.UWinnipeg.ca
Copies to: INROADS-L at post.queensu.ca, cpi-ua at vcn.bc.ca
Send reply to: cpi-ua at vancouvercommunity.net
Subject: [CPI-UA] Open Access to Scientific Research
Here is the best source of public domain health information:
http://medlineplus.gov/
It's not just health information.
It's also environment information and democratic accountability and
particpation information.
[Excerpt]
New York Times Editorial August 7, 2003
A number of influential scientists have begun to argue that the cost
of research publications has grown so large that it impedes the
distribution of knowledge. Some subscriptions cost thousands of
dollars per year, and those journals are usually available online
only to subscribers. This looks less like dissemination than
restriction, especially if it is measured against the potential
access offered by the Internet. That is why a coalition led by Dr.
Harold Varmus, the former director of the National Institutes of
Health, is creating a new model, called the Public Library of
Science.
Several years ago Dr. Varmus's group issued an open letter, signed by
some 30,000 colleagues, calling on the publishers of scientific
journals to make their archived research articles freely available
online. Most journals declined, so they would not undercut the
profitable business of selling expensive subscriptions to libraries.
But there is a basic inequity when much of the research has been
financed by public money.
The Public Library of Science plans to confront that inequity by
establishing a new series of peer-reviewed journals that will be
freely available on the Internet. The first ones, published this
October, will be PLoS Biology and PLoS Medicine. The aim is to create
a freer flow of data about research and results. The journals will
pay for themselves by charging a small fee to the organizations and
institutions that support the research.
Most of us, admittedly, will not have much use for free access to new
discoveries in, say, particle physics. But it is a different matter
when it comes to medical research. Popular nostrums abound on the
Web, but it can be very hard, if not impossible, to find the results
of properly vetted, taxpayer-financed science and in some cases it
can be hard for your doctor to find them, too. The Public Library of
Science could help change all that, creating open access to research.
The publishers of scientific journals are naturally skeptical, but
the real test will come in the marketplace of ideas. What will matter
this fall, when the new journals make their debut, is how many
scientists choose to publish in them rather than in the journals
traditionally deemed the most prestigious in their disciplines.
Copyright 2003The New York Times Company
------- End of forwarded message ---------
:-) Message Ends; George(s) Lessard's Keywords Begin (-:
Freelance Media Arts, Management, Training, Mentoring & Consulting
On line: Internet / Workshops / Research / Presence / Content /
On location: TV / Radio / Production / ENG / EFP / Editing
Interests: Access / Activism / Communities / Cultures / Arts
Resume and more @ http://media002.tripod.com
Queries / Offers / Patronage /
Commissions should be sent to
media at _no_spam_web.net (remove _no_spam_ for use)
Rostered Volunteer UNV# 120983 & CESO/SACO VA# 11799
-Caveat Lector- Disclaimers, NOTES TO EDITORS
& (c) information may be found @
http://members.tripod.com/~media002/disclaimer.htm
Because of the nature of email & the WWW,
please check ALL sources & subjects.
- 30 -
More information about the PHM-Exchange
mailing list