PHA-Exchange> Speech to Parliamentarians --AIDS in Africa
aviva
aviva at netnam.vn
Sun Mar 24 07:20:12 PST 2002
THE HIV/AIDS CATESROPHE IN EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA
Urban Jonsson
Regional Director, UNICEF, ESARO
1. Armed conflicts and the HIV/AIDS pandemic dominate the lives of
people in sub-Saharan Africa. (SSA) Both are complex emergencies that
kill people. Last year, armed conflicts killed some 3-400,000 people,
while AIDS killed 3.4 million – almost ten times more. While armed
conflicts seem to have an almost limitless budget and world-wide media
attention, external assistance to fight the HIV/AIDS pandemic in sub-
Saharan Africa in 2000 was only US$215 million, equivalent to the value
of two jumbo jets and is still not the daily headlines news in the
world. Future historians will have serious difficulties to explain the
lack of worldwide action when a whole continent was threatened.
2. Updated estimates on the HIV/AIDS crisis have recently been
issued by the UNAIDS Secretariat. They reflect a shocking picture. At
the end of last year 40 million people were living with HIV/AIDS out of
which 26 million lived in SSA. In 2001, 3 million people died of
AIDS, of which 2.3 million lived in SSA, and 5 million were newly
infected, with 3.4 million in SSA. With only 10 percent of the world’s
population, SSA has 70 – 80 percent of the HIV/AIDS problem. And the
problem is getting worse.
3. At present more than 25 percent of the adult population are
infected in Botswana, Swaziland, Zimbabwe and parts of South Africa.
And even more scaring is the rapid growth of the epidemic. In 1990 in
South Africa less than 1% of pregnant women were HIV – positive; ten
years later the prevalence had increased to almost 25%. What do these
figures mean? During World War II Soviet Union was the country that
lost most people – 12 percent of the population – only one third of the
percentage HIV-positive in some African countries. We have no
experience of what will happen to a country where one third of the
population is dying.
4. For many years a ‘conspiracy of silence’ dominated most African
leaders. This ‘conspiracy’ has been broken at the senior national and
international levels. However, there is a 'Second Wall of Silence’,
not so well defined as the first wall, but even more damaging.
This ‘Second Wall of Silence’ includes the wall between government
officials and communities; between husband and wife; between parents
and children; between teachers and students and between boyfriend and
girlfriend. These walls reflect the social context in which
individuals construct and re-construct their roles. These walls hinder
necessary development and information. These walls must be removed in
any successful fight against HIV/AIDS.
5. Even if the first wall of the Conspiracy of Silence at the
national and international level has been broken, it has been replaced
by a ‘language of convenience’, a meta-language that is comfortable and
acceptable in high-level meetings. We talk about gender disparities,
when we know it is about men exploiting women, sometimes using
violence; we talk about non-consensual sex when we mean rape or we
talk about high-risk sexual behaviour when we mean male pleasure, lust
and power. Such language breeds hypocrisy and builds a wall between
our language and the reality.
6. This denial is combined with great hypocrisy. It is not very
useful to tell young people not to have sex, while at the same time
many leaders in society demand and have sex with young women and
girls. Or that some elders and even parents tell young girls to have
sex in exchange for money for food. Or the fact that sex-workers in
Durban had a boom during the HIV/AIDS conference in 2000.
7. It is very important to recognize that HIV/AIDS is a disease
very different from other diseases. First, HIV is invisible, neither
felt by the individual, nor seen by others. And less than 5% have
tested themselves. Second, it takes several years for HIV to develop
into AIDS, which is both felt and seen. Third, contrary to most other
diseases, AIDS kills people in the 20 – 35 years age group, leaving
children and elderly alone. And finally shame and stigma surround
HIV/AIDS; the Second Wall of Silence is hindering that people talk
about HIV/AIDS; instead, fatalism, hypocrisy and even cynicism grow.
8. Perhaps one of the most tragic results of AIDS is the explosion
of children orphaned by AIDS. In 1999 there were 13.2 million children
globally orphaned by AIDS, with 12.1 million living in SSA. The
traditional African extended family can not cope any longer. Many
cities are filled with street children. Children without shelter,
food, clothing and education. What will happen with these children
when they grow up? This in indeed an enormous emergency, and it is a
shame that the richer countries do not respond to this emergency on a
scale commensurate with the size of the problem
9. The HIV/AIDS crisis in sub-Saharan Africa must be seen in the
context of poverty. At this time when health and education services
should expand, many countries need to spend 20 – 30% of their national
budget on debt service, more than what they can afford to spend on
health and education together. Rapid and comprehensive debt relief is
therefore increasingly seen as necessary for governments to cope with
the rapidly deteriorating condition resulting from the HIV/AIDS
pandemic.
10. The response against HIV/AIDS has long been dominated by seeing
HIV/AIDS as an individual problem. This has led to health-services
interventions and communication efforts to change
individuals, ‘behaviour’. Most of these efforts have failed. It is
high time that we recognize HIV/AIDS as primarily a social problem.
Individuals have serious difficulties to change their practices in the
context of poverty, gender exploitation and peer-group pressure. People
who are poor are dominated by circumstance and chance. The social
context determines individual behaviour and not the other way round.
11. This is most clear when it comes to gender relationships. As
societies legitimize the subordination of women by men, women can not
construct their roles as confident partners in the negotiation of when,
where and how to have sex. There is absolutely no doubt that the
continuing silent dominance of men over women is a fundamental social
cause of the rapid spread of HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa. The right
to voluntary and confidential testing is strongly promoted by Western
donors. But whose rights are we protecting? The husbands rights to
decide not to be tested, or his wife’s right to know her husband’s HIV-
status?
12. Youth, particularly girls and young women, are the most
seriously infected age-group. This adds to the common perception that
youth is a problem. This orthodox thinking must be replaced by a
recognition that youth themselves are most likely to find solutions to
their problems. Employment, peer-group education and the promotion of
condom use are key strategies. Today many young people see no future,
so why bother about a disease that will take years to develop?
13. Unabated, the HIV/AIDS pandemic will move from a social crisis
to an economic, a political and a security crisis. I don’t think that
anybody here can envisage the result of a situation where one-third or
more of the most productive population has died or is dying in a
country. What is required now is nothing less than a ‘Liberation War
against HIV/AIDS’. If a country gets into war, the government
transforms its budget to a ‘war budget’; all resources are re-oriented
towards the war effort. This must be done in the War against
HIV/AIDS. There is no second chance for Africa in fighting this
pandemic. We are loosing battles every day – unless a mobilization of
all resources is made, we will loose the whole war. Internationally, it
requires a mobilization of resources far beyond the capacity of multi-
lateral and bi-lateral organizations. Given the serious debt-crisis in
SSA today, new loans can not be the principal solution to the resource
crisis in ESAR. Africa needs debt cancellation; not new debt.
14. Many donors have promoted the idea that NGOs and CBOs should
take the front line in the war against HIV/AIDS. This is really
bizarre. In which other war would governments trust NGOs to ensure
national security? No NGO has ratified any human rights convention.
It must be the state that is accountable for the results in the war
against HIV/AIDs. Finally, we have to stop wishing for ‘political
will’. Instead we should judge the political leaders for their
choices. The impunity of not choosing to take action can no longer be
accepted.
15. Why is it that ‘African problems require African solutions?’
The New Initiative for African Development, NEPAD, promoted by many
African leaders and praised by so many Western Governments, hardly
mentions HIV/AIDS as a threat to Africa's survival. While problems in
Kosovo, Timor or Afghanistan immediately were recognized as
international problems, with great attention and support from the
international community, problems in Africa are defined as problems for
Africans only. Africa is written off economically, mariginalized
politically, and now left alone with the greatest social catastrophe in
modern time.
16. Some countries in Europe fuelled and benefited from the slave
trade. Some European countries colonized Africa in the most brutal and
exploitative way. The Nordic countries have always been friends of
Africa. All Nordic countries supported actively of the de-colonization
and the struggle against Apartheid. All this was based on solidarity
and a firm commitment to the UN-principles of Peace, Justice and Human
Rights. Now Africa is threatened by HIV/AIDS. Many more people are
dying of AIDS than during colonization and Apartheid. The suffering is
enormous. People and governments in sub-Saharan Africa hope for
continued solidarity from the Nordic countries in the most difficult
war – the war against HIV/AIDS. You, parliamentarians are chosen for
your ideas and capabilities. It is now up to you to choose to act.
And act today, because by tomorrow it will be too late.
More information about the PHM-Exchange
mailing list